UK’s Insufficient Compensation System Slammed by Victim of AstraZeneca Vaccine Injury

Clare Bowie, a British woman who suffered paralysis after receiving the AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine, has spoken out against the United Kingdom’s Vaccine Damage Payment Scheme (VDPS) for its inadequate compensation.

Despite qualifying for the scheme, Bowie received a payout of £120,000 ($152,640), which she considers insufficient to cover the costs associated with her severe disability.

The VDPS, established in 1979, provides financial compensation to individuals adversely affected by vaccines, but Bowie argues that the payout should be adjusted for inflation and scaled based on the extent of disability.

Clare Bowie’s experience highlights the challenges faced by individuals who suffer vaccine injuries and the shortcomings of compensation schemes. After being injected with the AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine, Bowie developed a mysterious spreading paralysis that left her paralyzed from the chest down. While initially misdiagnosed, she was later diagnosed with acute disseminated encephalitis complicated by transverse myelitis (ADEM), a rare condition causing inflammation in the brain and spinal cord.

Bowie’s case raises concerns about the long-term effects of COVID-19 vaccines and the need for comprehensive support for those who experience adverse reactions. The VDPS, designed to provide financial compensation to vaccine-damaged individuals, is criticized for its outdated payment amount of £120,000 ($152,640), which has not been adjusted for inflation since 2007. Bowie argues that this sum falls short of covering the costs associated with severe disabilities, such as mortgage payments and necessary home modifications.

Furthermore, the VDPS does not scale payments based on the extent of disability, resulting in individuals with different levels of impairment receiving the same compensation. This lack of flexibility fails to acknowledge the varied impact that vaccine injuries can have on individuals’ lives. Additionally, the strict eligibility criteria, which requires individuals to be either killed or at least 60 percent disabled due to a vaccine, may exclude those with lower levels of disability from receiving any compensation.

Bowie’s case sheds light on the need for a more comprehensive and equitable approach to compensating vaccine injuries. While she eventually received a payout through the VDPS, she expresses concern for those who may struggle to prove their cases or face financial hardship due to inadequate compensation. Adjusting the payout amount for inflation and considering the extent of disability could help address these issues and provide fairer support for vaccine-damaged individuals.

As the discussion around vaccine safety and potential side effects continues, it is crucial to ensure that compensation schemes adequately account for the impact of vaccine injuries on individuals’ lives.

Read more…

By Kate Stephenson
Notify of
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x